crypto mortgage rule changes

The Trump administration has executed a dramatic shift toward cryptocurrency adoption, releasing a series of executive actions that would make even the most bullish Bitcoin maximalist pause to check their portfolio twice. The January 23, 2025 Executive Order “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology” fundamentally torched the Biden administration’s cautious approach, rescinding Executive Order 14067 and Treasury’s Framework for International Engagement on Digital Assets—apparently viewing regulatory prudence as innovation kryptonite.

This regulatory housecleaning established five policy objectives including protecting lawful blockchain use, promoting dollar-backed stablecoins, and providing the regulatory clarity that crypto markets have demanded since roughly the invention of fire.

The administration simultaneously banned Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), because apparently nothing says “embrace digital assets” quite like explicitly prohibiting the government’s own version.

The March 6 Executive Order escalated matters considerably by directing creation of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve—practically treating cryptocurrency like petroleum reserves, except with notably more volatility and infinitely more Twitter discourse.

The government plans to acquire approximately one million bitcoins, leveraging existing federal holdings while pursuing what officials describe as making America the “crypto capital of the planet.” Whether this involves actual planetary competition remains unclear.

Leadership changes reinforced this strategic shift, with SEC Chair Gary Gensler—crypto’s regulatory boogeyman—replaced by Paul Atkins, whose crypto-friendly stance and consulting work for cryptocurrency companies suggests enforcement actions may become as rare as profitable altcoin investments.

This change from heavy enforcement to regulatory facilitation represents perhaps the most notable policy reversal since the administration began. The administration’s first 100 days have made crypto policy a key focus, with expectations for unprecedented activity throughout 2025.

A newly formed Working Group received 60 to 180 days to recommend thorough federal regulatory frameworks, reviewing existing crypto regulations to determine which deserve rescission, modification, or retention.

The group must also submit stablecoin regulations within 180 days, providing the regulatory certainty that could theoretically prevent the next spectacular exchange collapse. The Working Group comprises a dozen members including Treasury and Commerce Secretaries alongside SEC and CFTC chairs.

The administration’s approach signals unprecedented government embrace of digital assets, transforming crypto from regulatory pariah to national financial strategy component—assuming, of course, that treating highly volatile digital assets as strategic reserves proves more successful than it sounds on paper. Institutions are increasingly establishing positions in Bitcoin and related assets, with tokenized deposits combining traditional financial systems with blockchain efficiency.

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Sparkassen’s Bold Crypto Move: Transforming 50 Million Users Into Digital Asset Traders

Sparkassen is set to thrust 50 million clients into crypto trading, challenging traditional banking norms. Will this reshape Europe’s financial landscape forever?

Eric Trump Warns: Banks Risk Irrelevance Without Crypto Innovation in a Decade

Eric Trump warns banks: adapt to cryptocurrency or face extinction. Will traditional financial systems crumble under the rise of decentralized finance? The clock is ticking.

Why Major Brands Are Secretly Embracing Bitcoin Payments by 2025

Major brands are quietly adopting Bitcoin, reshaping commerce and challenging traditional payments. Could this revolution redefine your shopping experience? Explore the future today.

Eric Trump Warns: Crypto’s Rise Could Leave Big Banks in Ruinous Regret

Is cryptocurrency poised to bury traditional banks? As blockchain innovation accelerates, the financial landscape faces a seismic shift. What does this mean for the future of banking?